![]() ![]() In conclusion, the author proposes that integration of vulnerabilities of socially disadvantaged groups into disaster mitigation policies can fundamentally reduce the loss of human life and economic loss of a society from natural disaster. Moreover, the counties with more socially disadvantaged groups are more vulnerable to disaster. The study of 534 counties of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas reveals that people living in poverty have a significant positive association with disaster fatalities and property damage, which demonstrates that natural disasters are likely to increase poverty. The study uses correlation and regression analyses to find the association between disaster impacts and different poverty conditions. ![]() This dissertation advocates incorporating the vulnerabilities of the marginalized population in each phase of disaster management planning, from mitigation to recovery. It argues that poverty conditions increase the negative impacts of disaster for socially vulnerable populations. Low-income and vulnerable populations that suffer most in natural disasters are females, children, elderly, disabled, and ethnic minorities This dissertation explores the association between natural disaster and poverty conditions among socially disadvantaged subgroups within the social, economic, and political contexts of the disaster affected regions in the Gulf Coast States. At the outset of the 1990s, Jencks & Mayer (1990, Mayer & Jencks 1989) ar- gued that if growing up in a poor neighborhood mattered, intervening processes such as collective socialization, peer-group influence, and institutional capacity were presumably part of the reason. Results synthesize the current body of literature on evacuation behavior and can help inform the design of more effective predisaster evacuation warnings and procedures. Although difficult to conduct in postdisaster settings, more prospective, methodologically rigorous studies would bolster inferences. Prospective, longitudinal designs are relatively uncommon. The influence of prior experiences, self-efficacy, personality, and links between expected and actual behavior were examined less frequently. ![]() Risk perception was a consistent positive predictor of evacuation, as were several demographic indicators, prior evacuation behavior, and having an evacuation plan. Eighty-three eligible papers utilizing 83 independent samples were identified. We conducted a systematic review to summarize and evaluate the current literature on demographic, storm-related, and psychosocial correlates of natural disaster evacuation behavior. Research on evacuation from natural disasters has been published across the peer-reviewed literature among several disparate disciplinary outlets and has suggested a wide variety of pre-dictors of evacuation behavior. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |